Subject	It wouldn't be anything like your beloved Z32's tranny. (n/m)
Posted by	AshsZ (The Rebuild King) on November 19, 2002 at 1:46 PM
	This message has been viewed 16 times.
In Reply To	so basically that would throw smooth shifting out the window (n/m) posted by TomGreen on November 19, 2002 at 01:27 PM
Message
Follow Ups	What are the pros and cons of dog gear engagement? - TomGreen 13:03:32 11/19/02 Syncronizers? Lack thereof. :) Dog gear engagement >> - AshsZ (The Rebuild King) 13:15:55 11/19/02 so basically that would throw smooth shifting out the window (n/m) - TomGreen 13:27:01 11/19/02 It wouldn't be anything like your beloved Z32's tranny. (n/m) - AshsZ (The Rebuild King) 13:46:32 11/19/02 well on a 'race' tranny..who cares about smooth shifting - genic 14:04:21 11/19/02 Does that mean i get to be cool and double clutch? (n/m) - BDz32 (FL) 14:15:22 11/19/02 Heh, I was hoping no one would bring the gay and curious - AshsZ (The Rebuild King) 14:21:45 11/19/02 Re: What are the pros and cons of dog gear engagement? - sparkie 14:20:58 11/19/02 Clutches? I don't need no stinkin' clutches. >>> - Buzz 16:44:09 11/19/02 I can shift any tranny without using the clutch - Technomancer 14:11:46 11/20/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.